It has been a huge week for Survivor viewers, and the conversation around the Survivor 50 finale is still getting louder. Fans who watched the live finale on Wednesday, May 20 have been dissecting every decision, every jury reaction, and every move that led to the final Tribal Council. Meanwhile, those who missed it live have spent the weekend catching up and weighing in for themselves.

On top of that, interviews with the Final Three have added even more fuel to the fire. Some of those conversations have been revealing, some messy, and some flat-out frustrating. Now, the latest finalist to enter the discussion is Survivor 50 third-place finisher Joe Hunter.

Joe spoke with TV Line the day after the finale to unpack the biggest moments of the night, reflect on Final Tribal Council, and explain how he views his own game now that it’s all over. His candor stands in sharp contrast to the Jonathan Young exit interviews, where he repeatedly argued that the jury was bitter and that he should have won.

Instead of launching a blame game, Joe started by showing gratitude. With the brand-new teaser trailer for Survivor 51 already out, he said he plans to “take it in while I can,” knowing full well that the spotlight is temporary and that he and the rest of the Survivor 50 cast will soon be replaced by the next group of players.

From there, Joe gave his thoughts on Final Tribal Council and praised the jurors who, in his view, truly listened. He singled out Emily Flippen, Rick Devens, Christian Hubicki, and Dee Valladares as examples of people who came in with open minds instead of a decision already made.

Joe then said that is exactly what a jury should do. But he also made it clear that not everyone approached the endgame that way. Without naming names, he suggested some jurors arrived with a verdict rather than a willingness to actually hear the finalists out. That, he admitted, left him feeling “cooked” and convinced he may never have had a real path to their votes. He even suggested Jonathan and winner Aubry Bracco may have felt the same pressure.

“It takes a special person to truly [put] emotion aside and listen,” he said, making it clear he believed only a few jurors genuinely did their jobs well.

When the discussion turned to bias and pre-existing relationships, Joe didn’t dodge it. He said that on returning seasons, everyone brings history into the game whether they want to or not. In his view, those relationships can absolutely affect the outcome. But he stressed that this does not necessarily mean the season was decided by pre-game alliances.

“You can hate them, you can love them, but the relationship matters,” he explained, noting that in Survivor, the social web extends far beyond the island itself. Watch parties, events, reunions, and years of shared history all shape how people see one another once the game begins.

“Most exit press I’ve seen point the finger everywhere else…I’m looking at it like, ‘it’s me…’”

That was the most powerful part of Joe’s interview: he did not hide behind excuses. He accepted responsibility for not playing a game that convinced the right jurors — or, at the very least, for not explaining his game effectively enough to win them over.

Now that he has had time to rewatch the season and see how he came across, Joe still believes he deserved at least one vote. But he also admits that if the jury didn’t reward him, he has to look inward first.

Joe also addressed Rick Devens, and while he may not have received his vote, he made it clear he has no issue with how Devens played. He pushed back against the idea that anyone had to follow one moral code in order to compete fairly. In Joe’s view, Devens was absolutely allowed to lie, cheat, or steal if that’s what it took to win.

He said the real issue was simpler: they were playing different games, and both could not be right at the same time. From the fan perspective, he argued, it often becomes a battle of hero versus villain when two very different strategies collide.

Joe even admitted that if he could redo his early clashes with Devens, that conversation would go very differently. And after Devens’ own post-finale comments, it seems the feeling may be mutual.

Still, Joe came across as thoughtful rather than bitter. He remains the kind of player many fans respect — fiercely loyal, deeply committed, and willing to stand by the people he protects. But in a season like Survivor 50, that same honesty may have worked against him, making it easier for others to hide their real intentions and use his loyalty as a weapon.

If Joe ever returns, and he has said he would do so in a heartbeat, it would be fascinating to see a version of him willing to play a little dirtier — or at least less predictably. As he put it, maybe next time he needs to be a bit more ready to “lie, cheat, and steal.

For more SURIVIVOR updates, follow Daily News.
Come back here often for Survivor spoilers, news and updates.